Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nbaer00787/Archive

Nbaer00787

Nbaer00787 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

06 March 2025

Suspected sockpuppets

Pwbumpedm (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools

Both of these users have been adding non-neutral content to Marc Mysterio, and while Nbaer00787 was blocked from editing the article for a week by Drmies, [1] I think they may be using another account to evade that block.

On several different occasions, Nbaer00787 has attempted to add various occupations and associated acts to the userbox as well as the short description of the page, [2] a behavior that Pwbumpedm has also displayed as well. [3] [4]

Both editors have been attempting to emphasize Mysterio’s relation to the World Boxing Council and adding information about him challenging Jake Paul to a fight. [5] [6]

They both also have a tendency to add sources such as Daily Express, including the same exact article as well, (compare [7] to the first added reference in this edit [8]) along with IMDB as well. [9]

The promotional tone, as mentioned before, has been another similarity shared between the two accounts, as seen here [10] and in these edits [11] [12] by Pwbumpedm.

It also is worth mentioning that Pwbumpedm‘s account was created under 4 hours after the partial block was given to Nbaer00787, [13] and Pwbumpedm‘s first edit to the article occurred just one minute later. [14] They also have not edited any other article as well. ProClasher97 ~ Have A Question? 10:00, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Have you bothered to google "Marc Mysterio" or check the sources of Irish Star or Daily Express? Are you actually interested in bettering Wikipedia articles or just causing mayhem. Grok AI is starting to become more reliable with the new update than is wikipedia because of editors like ProCLasher97. Nbaer00787 (talk) 12:14, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  - Nbaer00787, one more derogatory or pejorative comment out of you and I am just going to block you indefinitely. I'm going to leave a note on your talk page as well. Drmies (talk) 13:21, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

You deleted my edits and then now are worried about another editor's edits. I should not have been banned as I did not have any promotional tone. I only quoted the reputable news outlets of the daily Irish Newspaper and UK Daily Express paper.

I did not create a new account but should have my account unbanned.

Banning new editors on wiki that want to contribute hurts the credibility of wikipedia and begs the question why you joined wiki to start off with... If you joined just to vandelize sourced edits and not contribute in meaning way to wiki, then I feel sorry for you. Nbaer00787 (talk) 10:11, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not the above editor. I'm concerned that a successful public figure is being vandalized by removing rather than adding content that is well sourced.

If you can give me valid reasons why it should not be added, I'd be happy to consider this. Simply alleging other editors removed it or promotional is not very persuasive. When I google MARC MYSTERIO these boxing referencs are the first items that appear and Irish Star and Daily Express are longtime national media outlets and newspaper in UK and Ireland. Are you saying the information is not factual or the quotes are misattributed?

If so, please advise. Otherwise, it seems like these edits and banning the other noted user is just abuse and trolling. Go read the sourced articles. Pwbumpedm (talk) 10:53, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Sock already blocked. Closing. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:09, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]